Spoken English · Core Fluency

Tenses in Speech

Stative verbs, continuous overuse and perfect-versus-past choices that mark translated English in conversation.

Eight habits that mark translated English in conversation. Most Indian languages use one imperfective form where English splits into simple and continuous, so the continuous leaks everywhere: I am thinking you are right, I am knowing, she is having two kids, I am going to office daily. Each concept isolates one leak, names the mother-tongue pattern behind it, and gives the form a native speaker would actually say.

Spoken English
Easy level
8 concepts
15 practice questions

1Stative verbs stay simple

I am thinking you are right is one of the most common giveaways in Indian English. Think, know, want, like, understand, believe, need, remember, mean, belong name states, not actions — they do not take the continuous, even when the state is true right now. The natural form is simply I think you are right, or I know the answer.

The leak comes from translation. Telugu and Hindi both use a present imperfective for what is true now, so anipistundi and lagta hai come out as an -ing form. English instead asks a different question first: is this verb an action unfolding, or a state that just holds? A state holds; it does not unfold, so there is nothing for -ing to describe.

The test that works in real time: if you can naturally say it slowly or quickly, it is an action and the continuous is available. You can eat slowly; you cannot know slowly, and you cannot think-an-opinion slowly. If adding slowly sounds absurd, keep the verb simple.

Figure. States hold; they do not unfold. If slowly sounds absurd, keep the simple form.

The two-second check

Name what the verb doesIs it something happening (eat, run, write) or something that is just true (think, know, want, belong)?
Try the slowly testEat slowly works; know slowly and think-you-are-right slowly are absurd. Absurd means the verb is stative.
Keep it simpleA stative verb takes the simple form whatever the time frame: I think, I know, I knew, I have known.

The stative families worth memorising
Family	Verbs	Interference form	Natural form
Thinking / believing	think, know, understand, believe, mean	I am thinking you are right	I think you are right
Wanting	want, need, prefer	I am wanting a transfer	I want a transfer
Liking	like, love, hate	She is liking the new team	She likes the new team
Having-as-owning	have, own, belong	They are having a big house	They have a big house
Seeming	seem, appear, sound	It is seeming difficult	It seems difficult

A friend says the later train is safer. You agree. Which reply would a native speaker say?

I am thinking you are right.
I think you are right.
I am think you are right.
I thinking you are right.

An opinion is a state, so think stays simple: I think you are right. The continuous in the first option is the direct translation of the mother-tongue imperfective and is exactly the form this concept exists to remove. The last two options break the grammar: am needs an -ing form, and a bare thinking needs be.

2Thoughts can't take -ing

Think has two lives, and Indian English usually picks the wrong one. When think means an opinion or belief — I think you are right, I think this plan will work — it is stative and stays simple. When think means considering right now — Wait, I'm thinking; I'm thinking about changing jobs — the continuous is natural because a mental process is unfolding.

The mother-tongue helper on the board is only a cue, never something to say aloud: naaku anipistundi / mujhe lagta hai / enakku theriyum often push speakers toward I am thinking / I am feeling for a settled opinion. English wants the simple form for that job.

The split to carry into conversation: if you can swap believe or reckon, keep it simple. If you mean give me a second, I'm working it out in my head, -ing is fine.

Figure. Opinion and belief verbs stay simple: know, believe, understand, mean.

Picking the right think

Swap believeI believe you are right fits — this think is an opinion. Keep it simple: I think you are right.
Or mean working it outGive me a second, I'm working it out fits — this think is a process. The continuous is fine: I'm thinking.
Say only the natural formRepair I am thinking you are right to I think you are right. Do not rehearse the -ing opinion form out loud.

Two lives of think
Sense	Swap test	Continuous?	Natural form
Opinion / belief	believe / reckon	No	I think you are right.
Considering now	working it out	Yes	Wait — I'm thinking.
Considering a topic	about + noun	Yes	I'm thinking about a career change.

Your colleague asks whether the new design looks cleaner. You agree. Which is natural?

I am thinking the new design looks cleaner.
I think the new design looks cleaner.
I am thinking about the new design looks cleaner.
I thinking the new design looks cleaner.

Agreeing with a judgment is an opinion, so think stays simple: I think the new design looks cleaner. The first option is the classic interference form. The third mixes the about-frame (for considering a topic) with a full clause that does not fit. The fourth drops be.

3Having: possession versus activity

She is having two kids does not mean what the speaker intends. Have has two lives in English. As possession or a relationship it is stative and stays simple: she has two kids, I have a bike, we have a meeting at four. As an activity it happily takes the continuous: having lunch, having a shower, having a party.

The interference is strongest here because Telugu and Hindi express possession through an existential plus a dative (naaku iddaru pillalu unnaru, mere do bacche hain), so there is no possession verb to anchor the English on, and the continuous fills the gap.

The split to carry: if have can be replaced by own or possess, keep it simple. If it can be replaced by eat, take or hold-an-event, the continuous is fine: we are having dinner at eight is perfectly natural.

Figure. Have for possession or illness stays simple; only activities take -ing (having lunch).

How to split have

Substitute ownShe owns two kids is grotesque but grammatical as a test: own fits, so this have is possession. Keep it simple.
Substitute eat or holdWe are eating dinner fits, so having dinner is an activity and the continuous is available.

One verb, two behaviours
Sense	Test substitute	Continuous?	Example
Possession, family, illness	own / possess	No	She has two kids. I have a cold.
Meals, washes, events	eat / take / hold	Yes	We're having lunch. He's having a shower.

Which sentence would a native speaker actually say?

My uncle is having three shops in Vijayawada.
My uncle has three shops in Vijayawada.
My uncle is having three shops since 2015.
My uncle having three shops in Vijayawada.

Owning shops is possession, so have stays simple: has three shops. The first option applies the continuous to a possession sense. The third stacks a second error on top: since with a plain continuous. The last drops the verb be entirely, which no register of English allows in a full sentence.

4Finished time takes the past simple

I have seen him yesterday is a collision between two systems. The present perfect connects a past event to now, and it refuses any finished-time adverb. The moment you say yesterday, last week, in 2019 or when I was in college, the time is closed and the past simple takes over: I saw him yesterday.

The perfect earns its place when the time is open or unstated and the present result is the point: I have seen this movie (so don't spoil it), she has already left (so stop waiting). Indian English reverses the mapping because many Indian languages use one perfective for both, and because the perfect feels more polite or more complete.

The rule survives conversation speed: hear a finished-time word, say the past simple. No time word, and the point is the present situation, take the perfect.

Figure. A finished time word (last month, yesterday, in 2019) locks the past simple.

Choosing in real time

Listen for the time wordYesterday, last month, in 2019, ago: all of these close the time window.
Closed window: past simpleI met her in March. We launched the app two years ago.
Open or no window: perfectI have met her (at some point). We have launched the app (and it is live now).

You are telling a colleague about a completed trip. Which is natural?

I have visited Delhi last month for the conference.
I visited Delhi last month for the conference.
I am visiting Delhi last month for the conference.
I have been visiting Delhi last month for the conference.

Last month is finished time, so the past simple is the only fit: I visited. The first option welds the perfect to a closed time window, the standard interference form. The third and fourth put ongoing forms against a finished-time adverb, which no context rescues.

5Since a point, for a stretch

I am working here since two years carries two interference errors in six words. Since takes a starting point (since 2023, since Monday, since I joined); for takes a stretch of time (for two years, for a week). Two years is a stretch, so it needs for.

The second error is the tense. A situation that started in the past and is still running takes the present perfect continuous, not the plain continuous: I have been working here for two years. The plain continuous only describes now, and cannot hold a duration.

Both fixes install together as one frame: have been + -ing + for/since. Say the frame five times with your own facts and it becomes automatic: I have been living in Pune since 2021. I have been learning German for three months.

Figure. Since names a starting point; for names a stretch of time.

Repair in two moves

Point or stretch?2023, Monday, my wedding: points, take since. Two years, six months, a long time: stretches, take for.
Install the frameStarted in the past, still true: have been + -ing. I have been working here since 2023.

Since and for, sorted
Takes since (a point)	Takes for (a stretch)
since 2023	for two years
since last Monday	for a week
since I joined this team	for six months
since this morning	for a few hours

A recruiter asks about your current job. Which answer is natural?

I am working at Infosys since three years.
I have been working at Infosys for three years.
I am working at Infosys for three years.
I have been working at Infosys since three years.

Three years is a stretch, so it takes for, and a still-running situation takes have been working. The first option is the full interference form with both errors. The third fixes neither the tense nor keeps the duration reading. The fourth fixes the tense but still welds since to a stretch.

6No will inside the if-clause

If he will come, I will tell him doubles the future. English marks the future once, in the result clause; the condition stays in the present simple: If he comes, I will tell him.

The leak is honest: the condition genuinely is about the future, and many Indian languages happily mark it so. English treats the if-clause as a frame, not a claim, so it takes the tense of a plain fact.

The same discipline covers when, as soon as, before, after and until in future sentences: I will call you when I reach, not when I will reach. One future per sentence, in the main clause.

Figure. The if-clause stays present; will belongs in the result clause.

Placing the future

Find the frame clauseThe part after if, when, as soon as, until: that is the frame. It takes the present simple.
Put will in the resultThe main clause carries the future: If it rains, we will move the match indoors.

Which sentence is natural?

If the client will approve the design, we will start the build.
If the client approves the design, we will start the build.
If the client approves the design, we start the build tomorrow at his office maybe.
If the client will approve the design, we start the build.

The if-clause is a frame and stays in the present simple; the main clause carries will. The first and fourth options put will inside the frame, the exact doubled-future error. The third is grammatical as a schedule reading but the trailing maybe contradicts the fixed-schedule sense it would need, so it reads as unsorted planning rather than a natural answer.

7Daily routines take the present simple

I am going to the office by bus describes today; I go to the office by bus describes your life. Hindi and Telugu use their imperfective for both, so the continuous leaks onto routines: I am staying in Madhapur, he is working in TCS, we are using Jira.

English reserves the continuous for what is unfolding or temporary. The simple form owns habits, schedules and standing facts, usually with a frequency word: I usually leave at nine. She takes the metro every day.

The pair worth internalising: I live in Hyderabad states your settled home; I am living in Hyderabad signals a temporary arrangement, and a native listener hears exactly that difference. The continuous is not wrong here; it is a different claim, and most of the time the settled claim is the one you mean.

Figure. Settled facts and daily routines take the present simple, not the continuous.

Now versus always
You mean	Form	Example
A settled fact or habit	present simple	I work at Wipro. I take the 8:15 train.
Happening right now	present continuous	I'm working from home today.
A temporary arrangement	present continuous	I'm staying with my cousin until the flat is ready.

Someone at a wedding asks what you do. Which reply is natural for a permanent job?

I am working as a pharmacist in Guntur.
I work as a pharmacist in Guntur.
I am work as a pharmacist in Guntur.
I works as a pharmacist in Guntur.

A permanent job is a standing fact and takes the present simple: I work as. The first option is grammatical English but claims a temporary arrangement, which is not what a settled job means; as the default answer it is the interference habit. The third and fourth options break agreement mechanics: am needs an -ing form, and I never takes works.

8Two futures: arranged and on-the-spot

Indian English runs almost everything through will, because most Indian languages have one future. English splits it. An arrangement that already exists takes the present continuous: I'm meeting the vendor tomorrow. A decision made this second takes will: The phone's ringing, I'll get it.

Saying I will meet the vendor tomorrow is not ungrammatical, but to a native ear it sounds like the decision is being made right now, mid-sentence, which is odd for a meeting already in the calendar.

A working default for conversation: calendar things in the continuous, promises and instant offers with will. I'm flying to Chennai on Friday. Don't worry, I'll send you the notes tonight.

Figure. A calendar arrangement prefers present continuous; will fits an on-the-spot decision.

Picking the future

Already arranged?In the calendar, tickets booked, both parties know: present continuous. We're launching on the 4th.
Deciding right now?Offers, promises, snap decisions: will. I'll take care of it.

Your manager asks about tomorrow. The meeting has been in the calendar for a week. Which reply is the natural default?

I will meet the auditors tomorrow at ten.
I'm meeting the auditors tomorrow at ten.
I meet the auditors tomorrow at ten, it is possible.
I'll be meet the auditors tomorrow at ten.

An existing arrangement takes the present continuous: I'm meeting. Will in the first option frames a week-old plan as a decision being made mid-sentence, which is the habit this concept corrects. The third staples a hedge onto a schedule form and undercuts it. The fourth mixes will be with a bare verb; the continuous form would need meeting.

Notes

Stative verbs — think (for opinions), know, want, like, understand, believe, remember, need, and have when it means possession — describe states, not actions, and stay in the simple form even when the state is true right now: 'I think you are right', never 'I am thinking you are right'; 'I know the answer', never 'I am knowing the answer'. Most Indian languages let the progressive cover states, so the -ing habit transfers straight into English, where it immediately marks the sentence as translated.
A finished time expression — yesterday, last week, in 2020, two years ago, when I was in college — forces the past simple: 'I met him yesterday', not 'I have met him yesterday'. The present perfect connects a past event to now and cannot sit beside a time that is already closed.
'Since' takes a starting point (since 2019, since Monday) and 'for' takes a length (for three years, for two hours), and both normally ride on a perfect form: 'I have lived here since 2019', 'I have been working here for five years'. 'I am living here since 2019' is the direct-translation version and is wrong.
After 'if' and 'when' in a future condition, English uses the present simple even though the meaning is future: 'If it rains, I will stay home', 'When she arrives, we will start' — never 'if it will rain'.
Daily routines and timetabled facts take the present simple: 'I go to office at nine.' Saying 'I am going to office at nine' turns the routine into a one-time plan for today.

Formulas

Stative rule: state verb + simple form. 'I think you are right' (opinion) but 'Wait, I'm thinking' (considering right now). 'I have two brothers' (possession) but 'I am having lunch' (activity).
Finished-time rule: yesterday / last X / in + past year / X ago → past simple. 'She joined the team in 2021.'
Duration frame: have/has + past participle (+ -ing) + since [start point] or for [length]. 'We have known each other for ten years.'
Future condition: If/When + present simple, ... will + verb. 'If the bus is late, I will call you.'

Exam traps & shortcuts

Ask 'how long has this been true?' — if the answer is still true now, use the present perfect with since/for; if the time is closed (yesterday, last year), the past simple is the only choice.
Catch yourself saying am/is/are + thinking (for an opinion), knowing, wanting, liking, understanding, or having (for possession): strip the -ing on the spot. The simple form is always right for these verbs. 'I'm thinking' is fine only when you mean 'give me a second — I'm working it out'.
'Will' never follows 'if' in a condition — say the if-half in the present and keep 'will' for the result half.

Reference tables

Each row is one leak from mother-tongue aspect into English. If you catch yourself saying the left column, the right column is the repair.

The tense traps, on one sheet
Interference form	Natural form	The rule at work
I am thinking you are right	I think you are right	Opinion think stays simple
I am knowing the answer	I know the answer	Stative verbs stay simple
She is having two kids	She has two kids	Possession have is stative
I have seen him yesterday	I saw him yesterday	Finished time takes the past simple
Working here since two years	Working here for two years	For takes a stretch; since takes a point
I am working here since 2023	I have been working here since 2023	Still-running situations take have been + -ing
If he will come, I will tell him	If he comes, I will tell him	The if-clause stays present
I am going to office by bus (daily)	I go to the office by bus	Routines take the present simple
I will meet him tomorrow (in calendar)	I'm meeting him tomorrow	Arrangements take the present continuous

Recap

Seven lines to keep. Each one kills the most common version of its trap in live conversation.

Opinion think: I am thinking you are right → I think you are right. -ing is only for 'I'm working it out'.
Slowly test: Know slowly is absurd, so know is stative: no -ing, ever.
Own or eat: If have means own, keep it simple; if it means eat or hold, -ing is fine.
Closed time: Yesterday, last week, ago: the window is shut, use the past simple.
Point vs stretch: Since 2023, for two years: a point takes since, a stretch takes for.
One future: Will lives in the main clause; the if or when clause stays present.
Life vs today: I go to the office is your life; I am going is just today.

Practise Tenses in Speech

Reading is free and needs no account. Practice, mocks and progress live in the app.

15 exam-style questions on this topic, with explanations
A 6-question practice set that ends the chapter
Timed mocks scored with the real marking scheme
Readiness tracked per topic, kept on your device

Continue with Google — freeNo card, no trial. Works offline once installed.